Sunday, November 14, 2010

Fighting the TSA

The Internet is currently burning up with a story about a man who would rather not fly than submit to the TSA's intrusive screening procedures, and how the TSA reacted to him. To make a long story short, once he decided to leave the security area and ask for a ticket refund, a TSA agent told him he had to return to the security area or would be subject to a civil fine of up to $10,000. A normal person's reaction to reading this story might be outrage at this sort of petty tyranny. As a lawyer, my first reaction was to question whether the threat was real. That is, is this a case of abuse of power by a misguided TSA employee acting outside his authority, or is it a case of abuse of power by a misguided TSA employee enforcing an egregiously bad law?

After about an hour of searching, I strongly suspect that this is a case of abuse of power by a misguided TSA employee acting outside his authority, though I have not been able to convince myself of that fact, and so the normal disclaimers about nothing on this blog being legal advice should go at least double for this post.

The reason I strongly suspect that this is a case of abuse of power by a misguided TSA employee acting outside his authority is that the regulations on penalties and prohibitions mostly focus on making sure that you can't get certain things into secure areas. For example, 49 C.F.R. 1540.107 says that no one can enter the sterile area or board an aircraft without going through a screening. However, in this case, the putative flyer wasn't trying to get into the sterile area or an aircraft without going through a screening - he made a conscious decision to avoid a screening by not entering the sterile area or boarding an aircraft. Similarly, 49 C.F.R. 1540.109 prohibits threatening, interfering with, assaulting or intimidating screening personnel. However, in this case, the putative flyer wasn't interfering at all. Indeed, the screening personnel could have done their jobs more easily if they had simply let him leave the airport. Because there is no evidence that leaving the airport had any adverse effect on security, or on the ability of the screening personnel to screen other passengers, it seems to fall outside of the general scope of the regulations, and so I suspect that the threat of a $10,000 civil penalty was not supported by law.

However, the reason I haven't been able to convince myself of the fact that a civil penalty couldn't have been imposed is that the relevant law is more than a little bit difficult to wade through, and the regs have previously been applied in ways that seem patently unjust. In terms of difficulty wading through the regs, I will give one example: 49 U.S.C. 46301(a)(5):

(A) An individual (except an airman serving as an airman) or small business concern is liable to the Government for a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 for violating—
(i) chapter 401 (except sections 40103 (a) and (d), 40105, 40106 (b), 40116, and 40117), section 44502 (b) or (c), chapter 447section 44502 (b) or (c), chapter 447 (except sections 44717–44723), or chapter 449 (except sections 44902, 44903 (d), 44904, and 44907–44909) of this title; or
(ii) a regulation prescribed or order issued under any provision to which clause (i) applies.

And that's just one example. As a lawyer, I can wade through that, cross checking sections, examining applicability to a given situation, etc. However, as a human being, I don't do that sort of thing for fun, and no one is paying me to write this blog. In terms of unjust application of the regs in the past, I refer readers to Rendon v. TSA an unhappy case where a civil fine imposed for asking some rather profane (but not unreasonable) questions about security procedures was upheld under the prohibition on interfering with screening personnel. While I think imposing a fine for trying to leave an airport is even worse than the situation in Rendon, given the result in Rendon, it wouldn't surprise me terribly if a fine, in fact, were imposed.

So what will happen in this particular case? Probably nothing. I doubt the TSA will seek penalties, given that the whole incident was video taped, and a trial would only lead to bad press and the possibility of their powers being curtailed. In the end, my guess is the whole thing will blow over, the TSA will keep their current security policies in place, and most people (e.g., me) who can't afford to skip flights just because we might not want to be molested by the TSA will end up being subjected to whatever form of invasive screening the TSA thinks is warranted without any realistic avenue for recourse.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

There's got to be something we can do. We cannot be squashed like ants under their thumbs - just because they can!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

You Mr. Morriss, as well as a host of other law abiding citizens, are as much to blame for this rediculas situation as anyone. If what you say is true, that "most people (e.g., me) who can't afford to skip flights just because we might not want to be molested by the TSA will end up being subjected to whatever form of invasive screening the TSA thinks is warranted without any realistic avenue for recourse" is shameful! Everyone knows TSA is wrong but for some no good cowardice reason, no one is standing up to them. Don't blame the system, blame yourself! I for one will fight...hopefully others will too!! Otherwise you can all kiss the notion that the USA is "Land of the Free" goodbye!!!

Runescape Money said...

It makes it go a entire lot smoother in case you have much more food inside the bank than you think you might have to have RS Gold. Training against a monster that is aggressive and will attack an individual of your level, without having a different thought RS Gold, is very useful due to the fact you may not need to click on another monster over and more than to attack it.

anonymous said...

hi, im currently in a Rendon v. TSA situation myself with one exception, my outbursts at the time had to do with the way my pat down was conducted (his hand reached some uncomfortable places).. im not a stranger to the process.. i constantly opt out of the body imager and usually have a copy of my ron paul constitution in my pocket for the TSA to "discover" during the pat down.. but something went wrong this time.. any advice? i have no intention of paying the fine but reading your wonderful post and the linked pdf pretty much killed my "overboad" argument

William Morriss said...

I don't have any advice on how to avoid the TSA fine. I also generally opt out of their standard screening programs, and find their alternate screening to be highly intrusive, but don't know any legal mechanism by you can avoid it.

Anonymous said...

In the case of someone being charged with an incident at a US airport and later not convicted with a "withold of adjudication of guilt" and the record was in the process of being sealed, does this person have to pay the said $ penalty as just received from TSA?

Thank you.

Anonymous said...

The particular gw 2 gold commence with your People, any contest you must be familiar with. Inside gw2 gold guide, the particular Humans are seen as the underdogs : that they constantly have difficulty for his or her put in place the globe while using advice of the great number of gods.